This Day in History: SALT I negotiations begin
On this day in 1969, Soviet and US negotiators meet in Helsinki to begin the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT), aiming to curb the Cold War arms race.
The meeting was the climax of years of discussions between the two nations and the negotiations continued for nearly three years, until the signing of the SALT I agreement in May 1972. Talks centered around two main weapon systems: anti-ballistic missiles (ABM) and multiple independent re-entry vehicles (MIRVs- missiles with multiple warheads, each capable of striking different targets).
At the time the talks began, Director of the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency Gerard Smith was put in charge of the US delegation, while National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger began negotiations with the Soviet ambassador in America.
The Soviets held a slight advantage in ABM technology; the US, however, was quickly moving ahead in developing MIRVs, which would give it a tremendous qualitative advantage over Soviet offensive missile systems. Control of ABMs was key, from the US perspective. After all, no matter how many missiles the United States developed, if the Soviets could shoot them down before they struck their targets they were of limited use.
And, since the Soviets had a quantitative lead in the number of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and submarine launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), an effective Soviet ABM system meant that the Russians could launch devastating nuclear attacks with little fear of reprisal. From the Soviet side, the US development of MIRV technology was particularly frightening. Not only were MIRV missiles technologically superior to Soviet weapons, there were also questions as to whether even an advanced ABM system could protect the Soviet Union from this type of missile.
The SALT I agreement finally reached in May 1972 limited each nation to no more than 100 ABM launchers at each of two sites of their own choosing. Offensive weapons were also limited. The United States would be held to 1,000 ICBMs and 710 SLBMs; the Soviets could have 1,409 ICBMs and 950 SLBMs. The administration of President Richard Nixon defended the apparent disparity by noting that nothing had been agreed to concerning MIRVs. American missiles, though fewer in number, could therefore carry more warheads.
Whether all of this made the world much safer was hard to say. The United States and Soviet Union essentially said they would limit efforts to both defend themselves and destroy the other. Their nuclear arsenals, however, were still sufficient to destroy the world many times over.
|
Responsible Right of Expression — In the interest of freedom of expression, coupled with a true sense of responsibility to encourage community dialogue, the Macau Daily Times offers its readers the opportunity to express their opinions on new-related matters through this website. All opinions are welcome. However, we reserve the right to remove comments that are deemed to be obscene, or are merely insults written under the cloak of anonymity. MDT |
- SINOPINIONS
- G2E Asia kicks off today
- New gaming law with temporary impacts
- Inflation still on the rise
- Lawmakers question viability of legal aid to imported workers
- Former Director of Rotary International visits Macau: “Looking for the peaceful world”
- 1,824 economical houses at MOP 1,137 per foot
- Patuá on the spotlight
- Summer activities for students in higher education
- Graff Diamonds plans to open Macau store
- 8th Shenzhen International Cultural Industries Fair: Can culture save Chin ese souls lost in material strife?
- SINOPINIONS
- Macau features “milestone” creativity in Shenzhen
- Hong Kong International Art Fair 2012: Huge number of visitors, “internati onalism,” and cat toys
- Country celebrates its 10th anniversary: Macau has been supporting East Timor









Post your comment